Tuesday, September 26, 2006
Shiites And Kurds In One Region!
Couple of weeks ago I was waiting for the metro to come when a man came and started a conversation. I immediately told him that I am from Iraq to spice things up! He was very interested. It wasn’t a long time before our conversation turned to politics.
We started to discuss the current issues concerning Iraq and the US. He asked about how things are in Iraq now [the usual question that follows the “huh, you are from Iraq!”]
“Is it as bad as we see it on TV and read about it in the newspapers?” he asked.
“No,” I said.
“Oh. Good,” he cheerfully said.
“It is worse,” I told him! And a whole new conversation arose!
What struck me was that this man, who claimed to be a news junky and never let it pass any news involving the American foreign policy, was totally ignorant. At least he doesn’t know anything about Iraq. Here is why:
We went in a deep discussion on the Iraqi politics, which I love to talk about because it confuses me, so how about the listener! We talked about the federalism law that is being debated in Iraq for more than two years now and every time the Iraqi politicians postpone making up their minds on where to stand with it.
If adopted, the law is likely to formally declare a three-state coalition in Iraq [it is not even a coalition because they would never agree on anything together] but lets call it this way. A Kurdistan region, which is already a separate state for a while now, a Shiite, turbaned and even more uncivilized region then what Iraq is now and finally a Sunni, poor and Bedouin-style region. That said, I should mention that Baghdad will be left to falsely represent the “United Federal Iraq.” But in reality, it will be left to stage the forthcoming massacre of more and more Iraqis. It will be the capital of homicide in the region!
I explained why some of the Iraqis, like the Sunnis, don’t want the federal bill to pass. One of the reasons I mentioned to this American guy was that the Sunnis will never allow the Shiites to enjoy all the oil resources they would be guarding in their region, while they [Sunnis] have nothing. At all. [in a previous post I have said that if the Sunnis had oil wealth in the provinces where they are a majority, they would be the first ones to call for federalism so that they would deprive the Shiite “brothers” from the wealth. And the same applied on the Shiites: if they had no oil, they would be the first ones to appose the bill, because they don’t want to ask the Sunni “brothers” for money whenever they wanted to finance one of the “reconstruction” projects in the south.
By the way, we’ve been hearing about why there are no tangible reconstruction projects seen in Baghdad or the western and northern sides of Iraq [the excuse was always that the security situation is the obstacle. But the southern part of Iraq, where the Shiites are the majority, is safe. Have you heard of any major reconstruction project there? Let me know! [and don’t send me links to projects inside American military bases there because I know that millions of dollars are spent this way!]
Anyway, back to politics.
So, as I was telling this “news junky” why federalism will never work in Iraq, although it maybe the only solution for the bloodshed in Iraq, he interrupted me to ask a question, which he also considered as his solution for Iraq’s problems.
“Maybe the Shiites and the Kurds can form one region and live in it because I know they have good relations,” he said, making a face that said “here you go. What do you think?”
I was speechless. I didn’t know how to reply. Here is a guy who told me that the CNN, The Washington Post, NY Times, LA Times and other main stream media organizations are his source for news and now is asking this question!
Here is a guy, who voted for Bush in both elections, and he doesn’t even know a damn thing about the country his Bush sent the American soldiers to. About a country that more than 2600 Americans have died in leaving maybe as many families behind to suffer the agony of their departure.
Is that how bad we are doing, I mean journalists? Are we misinforming the reader? Why?
“It doesn’t work this way,” I told the man, “there are the Kurds in the north, the Shiites in the south and the Sunnis in between.” I wanted to be as simple as I could.
“Oh. I didn't know that,” he said and kept thinking about another solution, but the metro came and I had to go.
I am shocked.
[I would like to talk in depth about Federalism and some other political issue in the next entry. So you think you want to hear about that? Or did we exhaust the topic already? I will wait for your replied on that question before I write it. I am kind of help-yourself blog now. So, you decide!]
Feeh
We started to discuss the current issues concerning Iraq and the US. He asked about how things are in Iraq now [the usual question that follows the “huh, you are from Iraq!”]
“Is it as bad as we see it on TV and read about it in the newspapers?” he asked.
“No,” I said.
“Oh. Good,” he cheerfully said.
“It is worse,” I told him! And a whole new conversation arose!
What struck me was that this man, who claimed to be a news junky and never let it pass any news involving the American foreign policy, was totally ignorant. At least he doesn’t know anything about Iraq. Here is why:
We went in a deep discussion on the Iraqi politics, which I love to talk about because it confuses me, so how about the listener! We talked about the federalism law that is being debated in Iraq for more than two years now and every time the Iraqi politicians postpone making up their minds on where to stand with it.
If adopted, the law is likely to formally declare a three-state coalition in Iraq [it is not even a coalition because they would never agree on anything together] but lets call it this way. A Kurdistan region, which is already a separate state for a while now, a Shiite, turbaned and even more uncivilized region then what Iraq is now and finally a Sunni, poor and Bedouin-style region. That said, I should mention that Baghdad will be left to falsely represent the “United Federal Iraq.” But in reality, it will be left to stage the forthcoming massacre of more and more Iraqis. It will be the capital of homicide in the region!
I explained why some of the Iraqis, like the Sunnis, don’t want the federal bill to pass. One of the reasons I mentioned to this American guy was that the Sunnis will never allow the Shiites to enjoy all the oil resources they would be guarding in their region, while they [Sunnis] have nothing. At all. [in a previous post I have said that if the Sunnis had oil wealth in the provinces where they are a majority, they would be the first ones to call for federalism so that they would deprive the Shiite “brothers” from the wealth. And the same applied on the Shiites: if they had no oil, they would be the first ones to appose the bill, because they don’t want to ask the Sunni “brothers” for money whenever they wanted to finance one of the “reconstruction” projects in the south.
By the way, we’ve been hearing about why there are no tangible reconstruction projects seen in Baghdad or the western and northern sides of Iraq [the excuse was always that the security situation is the obstacle. But the southern part of Iraq, where the Shiites are the majority, is safe. Have you heard of any major reconstruction project there? Let me know! [and don’t send me links to projects inside American military bases there because I know that millions of dollars are spent this way!]
Anyway, back to politics.
So, as I was telling this “news junky” why federalism will never work in Iraq, although it maybe the only solution for the bloodshed in Iraq, he interrupted me to ask a question, which he also considered as his solution for Iraq’s problems.
“Maybe the Shiites and the Kurds can form one region and live in it because I know they have good relations,” he said, making a face that said “here you go. What do you think?”
I was speechless. I didn’t know how to reply. Here is a guy who told me that the CNN, The Washington Post, NY Times, LA Times and other main stream media organizations are his source for news and now is asking this question!
Here is a guy, who voted for Bush in both elections, and he doesn’t even know a damn thing about the country his Bush sent the American soldiers to. About a country that more than 2600 Americans have died in leaving maybe as many families behind to suffer the agony of their departure.
Is that how bad we are doing, I mean journalists? Are we misinforming the reader? Why?
“It doesn’t work this way,” I told the man, “there are the Kurds in the north, the Shiites in the south and the Sunnis in between.” I wanted to be as simple as I could.
“Oh. I didn't know that,” he said and kept thinking about another solution, but the metro came and I had to go.
I am shocked.
[I would like to talk in depth about Federalism and some other political issue in the next entry. So you think you want to hear about that? Or did we exhaust the topic already? I will wait for your replied on that question before I write it. I am kind of help-yourself blog now. So, you decide!]
Feeh








